|
Post by mozeknows (Mets Head of OMG) on Feb 9, 2018 20:58:09 GMT -5
After using Telegram for a week or so, how are we all doing with it?
Are comfortable replacing Chatroll with Telegram as the primary league chat going forward?
|
|
|
Post by mozeknows (Mets Head of OMG) on Feb 14, 2018 10:52:39 GMT -5
There has been less activity in public chat overall compared to "how it should be in the season" which makes sense for this time of year. As we've continued using telegram and not chatroll, some owners have brought up concerns and/or missing chatroll. The voting in this poll stands at 6 in favor of permanent switching and 3 not in favor. I say that to show this could be treated as a minority opinion, and to reinforce I'm not making any proclamation here.
Feb 14, 10:39 AM MozeKnows: I do miss chatroll as well, but I like the PM and the accessibility of telegram. It's a shame chatroll PMs don't give push notifications like Telegram PMs do. Having two chats though is not workable. I've thought about putting an idea out there of using Telegram for PMs only, but I worry that that will drag down public Chatroll attendance in the season/over the long-haul.. (I feel like in season telegram public chat would be much busier than now, logically, too[same for Chatroll though])
We can't simulate what it will be like in the season for a chat without it being in the season-actually. Although it is not ideal, I am curious about using telegram for PMs only.
Personally, I think we could have telegram for PMs and chatroll for public and PMs and be fine as far as activity goes. I understand that communication would be a bit confusing, but if we're mostly talking deals in PMs anyway, it would be nice to have a full running record of PMs (Telegram) and if both owners are online, they could use telegram as a running chat. However, I know from past experiences of my own as well as what you all have expressed that two chats might not be a popular idea, even if there is only the one (Chatroll) public chat.
|
|