|
Post by Braves GM (Cameron) on Sept 23, 2019 14:36:05 GMT -5
Current rules call milb graduate contracts "Arbitration Players"
To better emulate MLB rules the following rule should be changed:
My proposed rule:
|
|
|
Post by Dodgers GM (Matt) on Sept 23, 2019 15:01:48 GMT -5
All for this.
|
|
|
Post by Rangers GM (Patrick) on Sept 23, 2019 16:47:36 GMT -5
I'm all for this. Let's call it the AJ Minter rule.
|
|
|
Post by mozeknows (Mets Head of OMG) on Sept 23, 2019 17:56:50 GMT -5
This idea makes sense as we try to emulate MLB. The idea to have 50% current year hit, and then no cap hits for future years on Arbitration players is more in line with how MLB handles their young players. It would have the added benefit of increasing Dynasty88 roster flexibility by having more opportunities to drop a player who is under-performing without having to incur a penalty for 5 years down the line, when the player in question may not even be in MLB anymore. This would also increase the number of young players with promise available on the waiver wire.
Edit: I am also for calling it the A.J. Minter Rule lol
|
|
|
Post by Reds GM (Rich) on Sept 23, 2019 17:58:09 GMT -5
yes please
|
|
|
Post by seeyalaterdylan (Orioles GM) on Sept 23, 2019 18:21:00 GMT -5
Also good with this.
|
|
|
Post by Giants GM (Rob) on Sept 23, 2019 18:21:24 GMT -5
I support the aj minter rule.
|
|
|
Post by thewelt15 on Sept 24, 2019 6:53:40 GMT -5
Thumbs up
|
|
|
Post by Royals GM (Brandon) on Sept 24, 2019 15:45:00 GMT -5
sounds good
|
|
|
Post by Indians GM (Patts) on Sept 29, 2019 21:20:27 GMT -5
Aj minter rule it is. Lol
|
|
|
Post by jhonny on Sept 29, 2019 21:59:38 GMT -5
Sounds good.
|
|