|
|
Post by Reds GM (Rich) on Jan 4, 2017 22:29:46 GMT -5
Guys lets have some fun with this!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2017 23:15:44 GMT -5
real baseball or here?
|
|
|
|
Post by Reds GM (Rich) on Jan 4, 2017 23:27:25 GMT -5
Here
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Sox GM (Max) on Jan 4, 2017 23:33:05 GMT -5
Me x6
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2017 23:39:31 GMT -5
yeah i dont think thats possible............ill research the teams and have an answer tonight sometime
|
|
|
|
Post by thewelt15 on Jan 5, 2017 16:43:08 GMT -5
Moze's stock is plummeting. haha
|
|
|
|
Post by Reds GM (Rich) on Jan 5, 2017 22:08:32 GMT -5
Freeman will not finish in top 5 for the 2017 season at first base. You read it here
|
|
|
|
Post by Royals GM (Brandon) on Jan 7, 2017 18:03:07 GMT -5
I think the better question is, who thinks their team is going to make the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
Post by mozeknows (Mets Head of OMG) on Jan 8, 2017 0:49:04 GMT -5
Moze's Offense Ranks
My offensive rankings are based on this system. The first thing I must do is say that I used their 2016 points-per-game results with no exceptions. For example, Kyle Schwarber's 0.5 ppg stood; the system isn't perfect.
Rankings are based on this scale:
<3.0 ppg -- 0 pt
3.1-3.5 ppg -- 1 pt
3.6-3.9 ppg -- 2 pts
4.0-4.2 ppg -- 3 pts
4.3-4.5 ppg -- 4 pts
4.6 ppg -- 5 pts
4.7 ppg -- 6 pts
4.8 ppg -- 7 pts
4.9 ppg -- 8 pts
5.0 ppg -- 9 pts
5.1+ ppg -- 10 pts
My thinking was that lower scoring players can be added or dropped without much penalty to offense. So they are all more similar than the top 50-60 guys based on ppg: those with 4.6 ppg or more. Those top hitters in my opinion are the ones most likely to repeat their success and for each step, they gain a point over their competition on a more gradual scale than hitters with 4.4 ppg or less.
Based on those numbers, I counted each team's current rostered players (a snapshot in time, another grain of salt to take with these results) and assigned point values to them. The Moze Rank, MZR is the total amount of "points" a team has going into next year. The mean is 51.571428... (the decimal goes on, but I cut it off there). The median is 52. The MZR offensive results are as follows:
Kansas City Royals: 34
Oakland Athletics: 36
Colorado Rockies: 47
Atlanta Braves: 47
San Francisco Giants: 49
Texas Rangers: 49
Chicago Cubs: 51
Cleveland Indians: 53
Washington Nationals: 53
Cincinnati Reds: 53
Baltimore Orioles: 56
New York Mets: 56
New York Yankees: 65
Boston Red Sox: 73
I took it one step further, to gain some perspective and bother some of our members lol. MZR+ is each teams offensive rank compared to the mean MZR. MZR+ = 100*(MZR/lgMZR), so the lg average MZR+ is 100. The results are as follows:
KCR: 66
OAK: 70
COL: 91
ATL: 91
SFG: 95
TEX: 95
CHC: 99
WSH: 103
CLE: 103
CIN: 103
BAL: 109
NYM: 109
NYY: 126
BOS: 142
On this day, do I think Brandon's offense is 34% worse than league average? no. Do I want Max to think he's got the beginning-and-end to our offenses at 42% better than league average? no. However, MZR+ gives me-and now all of you-a numbers-based comparative ranking.
Pitching Ranknings to come another day, hope you guys enjoyed!
-Moze
|
|
|
|
Post by Royals GM (Brandon) on Jan 8, 2017 13:42:11 GMT -5
Wow, im last... Never would have guessed. I guess i should just quit now.
|
|
